Fiji is facing a convergence of political attention and deep, long‑standing social challenges as a short state visit by India’s president and Parliament’s return share the public spotlight. While high‑level diplomacy and political developments draw headlines, two persistent problems demand urgent action: housing insecurity in hundreds of informal settlements and a large number of vacant chiefly and customary leadership roles in the vanua.
Housing and resettlement remain stalled
– Government agencies acknowledge that funding shortfalls and resistance from some illegal settlers have slowed resettlement efforts, leaving thousands of families in limbo. Officials say launching housing projects is complex and time‑consuming.
– There are more than 250 informal settlements on state, iTaukei and freehold land across Fiji. Specific local concerns include discussions around the possible eviction of about 100 families at Waisasa Settlement in Tacirua, though the site is not currently listed among active development projects.
– Since 2010 the iTaukei Land Trust Board has issued more than 40 land development leases intended to relocate squatters; however, tangible resettlement outcomes have been limited.
– The Public Rental Board has turned to smaller redevelopments to add affordable options. Notably, 36 Lagilagi units at Jittu Estate in Raiwaqa — long unoccupied — have been refurbished for potential rental or purchase and are being considered as an immediate housing option paired with welfare and livelihood supports.
Vacant vanua leadership undermines local governance
– The Permanent Secretary for iTaukei Affairs reports that more than 6,000 chiefly and customary positions remain vacant, with overall occupancy around 47 percent in recent years. Prolonged vacancies risk weakening vanua governance that is central to land negotiations, dispute resolution and community cohesion.
– The iTaukei Lands and Fisheries Commission has been conducting province‑by‑province consultations to fill Bose Vanua roles; recent rounds reportedly achieved about an 80 percent success rate and will be followed by training for newly appointed leaders.
Why the two problems are linked
– Customary and chiefly leadership plays a pivotal role in landowner consent, community consultation and culturally appropriate solutions. Vacancies in those roles make it harder to achieve community buy‑in for resettlement or redevelopment, slowing projects and increasing the potential for conflict.
– Conversely, visible, well‑managed housing projects that include clear tenure arrangements and livelihood pathways can help rebuild trust between communities, landowners and government agencies, making future initiatives smoother.
Global context
– UN‑Habitat highlights housing as a fundamental human right and warns of a growing global shortfall for adequate housing. Internationally cited estimates underline the scale of need and the importance of affordable, secure housing as a foundation for employment, education and health.
Practical recommendations and next steps
– Coordinate across ministries, landowners and traditional institutions so vanua leaders are part of planning from the start. Strong local leadership can help mediate disputes and reduce resistance.
– Prioritise transparent, community‑led consultations before any eviction or resettlement action to reduce conflict and identify culturally appropriate options for affected families.
– Use small redevelopment projects such as the Jittu Estate refurbishments as pilots to demonstrate standards, tenant support and links to livelihoods; successful pilots can attract additional investment.
– Explore blended financing models combining government funding, PRB involvement and development partners to accelerate affordable housing delivery.
– Provide targeted training and support for newly appointed Bose Vanua and chiefdom representatives so they can effectively participate in land‑use discussions and dispute resolution.
– Improve public communications with timelines and regular updates from housing agencies to reduce uncertainty and build confidence.
Additional comments and explanation
– Filling vacant chiefly positions is not merely a cultural priority: it is a practical governance measure that removes a key bottleneck to land development and resettlement. When traditional leaders are engaged and informed, they can broker solutions that are both respectful of custom and workable for government programs.
– A practical way to build momentum is to sequence interventions: (1) finish and publicise small, high‑quality housing redevelopments; (2) pair tenancy with livelihood and poverty‑alleviation supports; (3) scale successful models with blended funding; (4) continue to fill and train vanua leadership to facilitate broader community acceptance.
– Consider establishing a public dashboard tracking settlements, development status, tenure outcomes and community consultations to increase transparency and accountability.
Summary
Fiji’s immediate political events mask pressing structural issues: housing insecurity affecting hundreds of informal settlements and thousands of vacant customary leadership positions. Progress is possible if the government, traditional leaders and development partners coordinate, use small redevelopments as proof of concept, and prioritise transparent, community‑led approaches. Recent successes in filling Bose Vanua roles and refurbishing previously idle housing units offer a practical starting point to rebuild trust and accelerate solutions that improve living standards for affected families.
A hopeful note
Small, well‑managed wins can build momentum. Demonstrable outcomes — occupied, decent homes linked to poverty‑alleviation and supported by trained local leaders — can show communities and landowners that resettlement and redevelopment can be fair, feasible and beneficial, creating the trust needed for larger projects to follow.
Leave a comment