The UN Committee on Enforced Disappearances has welcomed Samoa’s report that no cases of enforced disappearance have been reported or brought before its courts, while pressing the Pacific island state for updates on two unresolved missing‑person cases and on how it manages extradition and return of foreign nationals without specialised training.
Matar Diop, the Committee’s vice‑chair and country rapporteur for Samoa, told the dialogue on Tuesday that “to date, no case of enforced disappearance had been reported or brought before the courts in Samoa, which was excellent news.” Committee experts nevertheless queried two separate disappearances — one in 2019 and one in 2020 — and asked what searches and investigations had been carried out and why the State party had not classified either as enforced disappearance.
Peseta Noumea Simi, Chief Executive Officer at Samoa’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade and head of the Samoan delegation, confirmed both cases remain the subject of open investigations. He said the 2019 disappearance had been widely publicised and that police and corrective services had opened an inquiry; the individual remains missing. The 2020 case involved a prisoner who escaped custody and, Simi said, was not treated as an enforced disappearance for that reason, although inquiries are ongoing.
Committee rapporteur Marija Definis pressed for progress reports and asked what specific search processes were in place. Diop also raised concerns about training gaps, noting Samoa’s report said the police had not provided specific training on the expulsion or return of foreigners. Simi told the Committee that extradition and related returns were rare in Samoa and that no formal extradition training programmes are currently conducted. When such cases arise they are handled by the Office of the Attorney‑General in consultation with other ministries, he said.
Simi highlighted that Samoa, a small island developing state with a population of just over 200,000, had not recorded confirmed cases of enforced disappearance and had put in place a framework of criminal legislation, oversight bodies and judicial protections intended as safeguards. He acknowledged, however, that domestic capacity constraints limited institutional development. Samoa’s law does include a provision allowing courts discretion to refuse extradition if it would be unjust, a limited safeguard the delegation said could be strengthened in future legal reforms.
In concluding remarks, Committee chair Juan Pablo Albán Alencastro thanked Samoa for engaging with the Committee’s review and signalled the body’s interest in follow‑up. The Samoan delegation to the Geneva session included representatives from a wide cross‑section of government agencies: foreign affairs, justice, corrective services, the Attorney‑General’s office, the Law Reform Commission, and other ministries and statutory bodies.
The Committee’s praise for the absence of documented enforced disappearances marks a positive finding for Samoa, but experts underlined the need for clearer procedures, record‑keeping and targeted training — particularly on extradition and the handling of foreigners at risk — and for regular updates on the two outstanding missing‑person investigations. Samoa reaffirmed its commitment to human rights and its willingness to continue cooperating with the Committee as it seeks to bolster institutional safeguards.
Leave a comment