A three-member Tribunal has concluded its inquiry into allegations of misbehavior against Christopher Pryde, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). Unanimously, the Tribunal determined that the allegations did not stand and advised President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu that Pryde should not be dismissed from his position.
The Tribunal, chaired by Justice Anare Tuilevuka alongside Justices Chaitanya Lakshman and Samuela Qica, submitted its findings to the President on December 23, 2024. After reviewing the report, the President recognized the Tribunal’s efforts and acknowledged the significant contribution it makes to legal understanding, particularly regarding the definition of “misbehavior,” which is not explicitly defined in the Constitution.
This ruling sets a new legal precedent and will aid the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) in evaluating complaints against judicial officers, including the DPP and other quasi-judicial figures. The Tribunal emphasized the need for established policies to guide evaluations of complaints in the absence of existing regulations, advocating for consistent, transparent, and accountable decision-making by the JSC.
In light of the Tribunal’s findings, President Lalabalavu has communicated with Pryde, including a copy of the Tribunal’s report. Additionally, the suspension that Pryde had been under since April 13, 2023, will be lifted, allowing him to resume his duties. The terms for his reinstatement involve the immediate reactivation of his service agreement with the government and the payment of his previously withheld salary and benefits.
To further facilitate Pryde’s return, he is required to report to the Chairperson of the Judicial Services Commission, where he will receive all official items related to his role.
The Tribunal’s report is now publicly accessible online, as mandated by Section 112(6) of the Constitution.
This resolution not only reinstates Pryde but also lays a foundation for increased clarity and procedural fairness in the evaluation of judicial conduct in Fiji. It is encouraging to see the establishment of a framework that promotes accountability and could lead to improved standards within the judicial system.
Leave a comment