Savenaca Narube, leader of Unity Fiji, has voiced significant concerns regarding the past coups in Fiji, asserting that those responsible have justified their actions as being in the interest of others, while they have personally gained from these political upheavals. As the country approaches the proceedings of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), Narube stresses the necessity for transparency and openness in the process.
He highlighted the distinct motivations behind each of Fiji’s three coups, noting that the intentions appeared varied on the surface. The 1987 coup, led by the current Prime Minister, was purportedly a response to protect indigenous land ownership. The coup in 2000 arose from fears concerning an Indo-Fijian government, while the 2006 coup aimed to address governmental corruption.
Narube suggested that the TRC should compartmentalize discussions according to the timelines of these coups. He emphasized the importance of complete and honest disclosures from those involved to ensure the effectiveness of the commission. To foster an environment where individuals feel safe to share information, he proposed that immunity be granted to those who come forth with truthful accounts, while penalties should be enacted for those who intentionally provide false information or obstruct the investigation.
Public engagement is vital for the success of the TRC, according to Narube. He indicated that sessions should be accessible to the public, with broadcasts and comprehensive meeting records made available to maintain transparency and trust. The final report of the TRC should be accessible to all, and Narube called on the state to adhere to any recommendations that arise from the commission’s findings.
Moreover, Narube underscored the necessity for adequate resources, including funding and technical support, to ensure the TRC can carry out its vital work of addressing historical injustices and fostering social healing. Establishing a TRC is a proven method to confront past wrongs and promote community reconciliation.
In summary, Narube’s perspectives on the TRC reflect a commitment to transparency, community involvement, and the need for a structured approach to dealing with Fiji’s complex political history. This could not only enhance public trust but also pave the way for healing and reconciliation within Fijian society.
Leave a comment