Acting Chief Justice Salesi Temo has expressed concern regarding the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Pryde, being seen in prolonged conversation with former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum for over 45 minutes. During his testimony in court, Temo highlighted that Sayed-Khaiyum was a controversial figure at that time, and Pryde, as the Chief Prosecutor, should have maintained a clear boundary to avoid compromising his position.
Temo emphasized the atmosphere of distrust that existed between the prior and current governments following the Coalition Government’s formation. He recalled that the Prime Minister had publicly stated that if senior public officials could not align with the new administration, they should consider resigning. As the chief prosecutor appointed by the previous government, Pryde was urged to adhere diligently to his legal responsibilities.
When questioned regarding whether the Judicial Services Commission had any information about the conversation between Pryde and Sayed-Khaiyum, Temo responded that there were no details available; however, he indicated that the photographic evidence presented in court spoke volumes, suggesting that a significant discussion had taken place.
Legal counsel for the Fiji Law Society, Laurel Vaurasi, inquired about existing guidelines for handling such complaints. Temo stated no formal guidelines were established but reiterated that judicial officers are trained in ethical behaviors, including maintaining constitutional oaths and avoiding conflicts of interest.
He elaborated that due to the differing accounts presented by the Attorney-General representing the government and the Director of Public Prosecutions, he felt compelled to recommend to the President, in consultation with the Attorney-General’s Office, that a tribunal be formed to address the situation. Temo stated it was crucial to resolve the discrepancies to prevent further issues between the government and the DPP.
The tribunal is currently investigating allegations of misconduct and may recommend to the President the removal of Pryde. Notably, on February 28, 2023, Pryde was observed conversing with Sayed-Khaiyum while the Criminal Investigation Department was actively probing Sayed-Khaiyum, with those files already in the possession of Pryde’s office. Furthermore, it has emerged that as of December 4, 2023, Pryde was receiving a superannuation payment of US$1000 per month without appropriate approval from the relevant judicial offices.
The trial is set to continue at 10 am, indicating that this matter is being treated with due seriousness by the legal system.
This situation underscores the importance of ethical standards and transparency within government operations, suggesting a commitment to accountability. As investigations unfold, there is hope for establishing clearer guidelines and restoring confidence within Fiji’s judicial framework.
Leave a comment