The recent sugar cane payments in Fiji, while heralded as record highs, mask a troubling reality for farmers, according to Opposition MP Viam Pillay. During a parliamentary address, Pillay pointed out that the final payment of $105.08 per tonne is largely a result of elevated global sugar prices rather than a genuine improvement in local agricultural productivity.
He expressed concerns about the persistent decline in both cane tonnage and production, asserting that the Fiji Sugar Corporation (FSC) struggles to meet export quotas. The challenges are compounded by escalating production costs and a rising cost of living, leaving farmers in a precarious position to manage their expenses. “On paper, it looks record-breaking but the reality is totally the opposite,” he remarked.
Pillay further reflected on more favorable conditions in the sugar industry during the previous administration, where numerous subsidies were provided to farmers for fertilizers, land development, and equipment. He criticized the current administration’s failure to deliver on promises, such as the establishment of a new sugar mill in Rakiraki, and accused the Minister for Sugar of misleading farmers about the industry’s potential for revitalization through ethanol production.
This critical perspective aligns with concerns raised in similar articles, showing that Fiji’s sugar production has historically faced significant declines, currently estimated at just 1.6 million tonnes. Minister for Sugar, Charan Jeath Singh, has acknowledged persistent challenges within the sector, including a decreasing number of active farmers and productivity issues. In response, Singh emphasized government support initiatives aimed at bolstering the industry while acknowledging the difficulties posed by factors such as climate change and inefficiencies within operational practices.
Despite the current adversities, the government’s ongoing efforts to financially support the sugar industry offer a glimmer of hope for its recovery. With targeted initiatives aimed at increasing farmer productivity and modernizing operations, there is potential for revitalization. This will require not only financial backing but also strategic investments in infrastructure and support systems to ensure that farmers are motivated to remain engaged in sugarcane cultivation.
The persistence of these discussions in Parliament illustrates the intricate relationship between governmental policy, farmer interests, and the overall health of Fiji’s sugar industry. Communities remain hopeful that through collective action and commitment, a sustainable solution can be achieved to secure the future of this vital sector.
Leave a comment