Opposition MP Premila Kumar has criticized Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka’s recent cabinet expansion, labeling it a “sham reshuffle” aimed primarily at maintaining the status quo. Kumar argues that instead of addressing inefficiencies and holding underperforming ministers accountable, the Prime Minister opted to appoint seven new ministers and assistant ministers. This decision, she says, showcases a failure to prioritize the needs of everyday Fijians.

In her statements, Kumar emphasized that this cabinet enlargement serves as a bailout for ineffective leaders rather than a genuine effort to improve governance. She contends that if current ministers were effectively doing their jobs, there would be no justification for increasing the cabinet size, which now totals a record 34 members—22 Cabinet Ministers and 12 Assistant Ministers. This move, she argues, goes against Rabuka’s prior commitments to reduce government size and cut unnecessary expenditures.

Kumar’s discontent also resonates with other political leaders, such as former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry, who has deemed the reshuffle “irresponsible,” pointing out that it places additional financial burdens on taxpayers amid rising living costs and declining public services. The continuing expansion of the cabinet without addressing critical issues, from poverty to infrastructure, reflects a broader disconnection between government actions and the challenges faced by ordinary citizens.

Despite the criticisms, there remains a hopeful perspective that these ongoing discussions may encourage the government to refocus on accountability and effective leadership. Advocates for change believe that the current political climate might stimulate necessary reforms, ultimately leading to a more responsive government. By prioritizing the well-being of its citizens and fostering a culture of transparency, the government could rebuild trust and improve public services.

In summary, the recent cabinet reshuffle has sparked significant debate in Fiji, highlighting the pressing need for accountability and effective governance. There is hope that through these challenging conversations, the government may take steps toward a more engaged administration—one that truly prioritizes the interests of all Fijians.