Fiji’s chief prosecutor, Christopher Pryde, who has been suspended from his position, has disclosed that the government secretly proposed a NZ$150,000 offer for him to resign and avoid an inquiry into alleged misconduct. Pryde, a New Zealander aged 59, rejected the proposal, asserting that he lacked the financial means to defend himself during the inquiry proceedings.
Pryde described the government’s actions as an effort to remove him, suggesting it aligns with an ethno-national agenda. He indicated that hiring practices in Fiji prioritize indigenous Fijians over merit-based considerations, pointing to a trend of foreign and Indo-Fijian individuals being marginalized.
The Judicial Services Committee (JSC) proposed the out-of-court settlement two months prior but has not responded to Pryde’s claims. The offer implied that his immediate resignation as the director of public prosecutions would conclude the matter, preventing any further legal actions from his side.
Despite contemplating resignation, Pryde expressed his desire for a formal acknowledgment of his innocence from the President, insisting he has not committed any wrongdoing. His suspension came after he was seen conversing with former Attorney General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum at a public event, which raised questions about potential misconduct regarding an ongoing police investigation.
The Fiji Law Society has raised concerns about the inquiry process, particularly regarding fairness and Pryde’s right to representation. They declined to represent him in the proceedings, emphasizing that the inquiry should not continue in his absence.
As the tribunal prepares to deliver final recommendations by December 23, Pryde anticipates the outcome will result in his removal from the office, with assistance from Nancy Tikoisuva stepping in as the acting chief prosecutor.
In summary, Pryde’s case highlights the complexities of political and legal dynamics in Fiji and raises questions about procedural fairness in government inquiries. The events also signal a significant moment for Fiji’s legal community as they navigate allegations of political interference.
As this situation unfolds, it is essential to remember that discussions around governance and representation can lead to constructive reforms. A focus on transparency and fairness in legal proceedings could pave the way for a more equitable system in Fiji, potentially benefiting all communities in the country.
Leave a comment