Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka’s recent appointments of three new ministers and three assistant ministers have sparked public outcry, particularly concerning the financial implications for taxpayers already facing economic pressures. In defense of his decisions, Rabuka emphasized the need for increased efficiency within the government, arguing that his current cabinet members have been overwhelmed by their responsibilities.

“I’ve been overloaded. We just felt that some of them are probably overloaded,” Rabuka stated, noting that he had held the portfolios now assigned to the new ministers. This restructuring aims to ensure that each ministry receives focused attention, potentially improving the effectiveness of governance.

Despite these explanations, there has been criticism regarding the financial burden of these appointments. Opposition MP Premila Kumar described the move as a “sham” and criticized the government for failing to hold underperforming ministers accountable. Kumar highlighted that the Cabinet now totals 34 members, contrasting sharply with Rabuka’s previous commitments to reduce governmental size and expenditure.

Professor Biman Prasad, the Minister of Finance, reassured that the financial implications of this cabinet expansion would be managed within the forthcoming 2024/2025 National Budget, using existing resources and staffing. He mentioned that some ministries already have office spaces and personnel, alleviating concerns about additional government expenditure.

This cabinet expansion, though met with skepticism, could potentially enhance the government’s responsiveness and effectiveness. By bringing in new ministers to handle specific portfolios, there is hope for renewed focus on key issues impacting citizens. If managed well, this restructuring could offer the administration a chance to demonstrate accountability and improve public services, addressing some of the pressing needs faced by the Fijian populace.

As the political landscape evolves, it remains essential for the government to engage with citizens and effectively address their concerns. The ongoing discussions and criticisms may act as a catalyst for improvements, possibly leading to a more efficient government that aligns more closely with the aspirations of the people.