The recent appointment of three new ministers and three assistant ministers by Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has led to significant public dissatisfaction, as concerns about the financial implications for already burdened taxpayers have emerged. In a defense of his actions, Rabuka stated the reshuffle was aimed at enhancing efficiency within the government.

He noted that his current Cabinet members have been overwhelmed, indicating that redistributing some of his responsibilities would allow for more focused attention on specific areas. “I’ve been overloaded,” Rabuka admitted, highlighting the need for structural changes to improve government performance.

Despite the backlash from the public and opposition figures, specifically MP Premila Kumar, who described the expansion as a “sham,” Rabuka remains steadfast in his belief that it will lead to better governance. Kumar raised concerns regarding the increase in the Cabinet to 34 members, contradicting prior commitments made by Rabuka to reduce government size and spending. She highlighted the potential diversion of funds from essential services amidst high living costs facing many Fijians.

In response to financial worries, Minister of Finance Professor Biman Prasad assured that the costs associated with these new appointments would be managed within the existing 2024/2025 National Budget. He emphasized that some ministries have existing office spaces and staff, reducing the need for additional funding.

As the government approaches the end of its term, there is a glimmer of hope that these changes could enhance accountability within leadership. The appointments may also signify a robust commitment to prioritizing the needs of Fijians, potentially addressing pressing issues through improved public services. While challenges remain, continuous engagement with citizens and attentiveness to their concerns can serve as a catalyst for needed reforms, ultimately leading to a more effective and responsive government.

In summary, while the cabinet expansion has incited controversy, it holds the potential for renewed focus and commitment to public service. If managed effectively, this restructuring could not only enhance governance but also align it closer to citizen expectations as the nation approaches the upcoming elections.