Fiji Global News

Your Window To Fiji And Beyond.

Illustration of Pryde calls for reinstatement as President reviews Tribunal’s findings

Pryde’s Suspension Report: What’s Next?

Spread the love

The Tribunal’s findings regarding the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Pryde, will eventually be made public. However, this will take place only after President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu reviews the report, conducts consultations, and seeks appropriate advice on the matter.

The President’s Office confirmed that the process will be postponed due to some officials being on holiday for Christmas and New Year. The report was submitted to Ratu Naiqama on December 23, 2024.

Christopher Pryde previously requested that the report be published, referencing Section 112 (6) of the Constitution which mandates public disclosure of the report. He was appointed DPP in 2011 but was suspended on April 13, 2023, pending the tribunal’s inquiry into allegations of misbehavior associated with his meeting with former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum.

A three-member Tribunal, led by Justice Anare Tuilevuka and including Justices Chaitanya Lakshman and Samuela Qica, was established to investigate the allegations against Pryde. In his correspondence to the President’s Office, Pryde highlighted constitutional stipulations indicating that if the tribunal’s report suggests insufficient evidence of misconduct, his suspension must be lifted, and he should be reinstated.

Pryde expressed urgency in resolving his case, stating it has been nearly 21 months since his suspension and that he has experienced significant financial difficulties since the cessation of his salary. Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has refrained from commenting, indicating that the matter does not fall within his jurisdiction.

A statement from the President’s Office affirmed the commitment to making the report public as required by law, emphasizing that the process will resume after the holiday break.

This situation underscores the importance of promptness and transparency in governmental processes, particularly when it concerns individuals in critical positions within the justice system. It is essential for both the individuals involved and the public that such matters be resolved efficiently to ensure accountability and maintain confidence in public institutions.


Comments

Leave a comment

Latest News

Search the website