Christopher Pryde, the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, has communicated to the Chairman of the Constitutional Tribunal, Justice Anare Tuilevuka, that he cannot partake in the tribunal hearing scheduled for the upcoming week. Pryde expressed serious concerns regarding the fairness and justice of the proceedings, citing his lack of resources to defend himself adequately.
In his correspondence, Pryde argued that continuing the hearing under the current conditions would violate the President’s directive to ensure the tribunal operates justly and equitably. He raised issues pertaining to international labor rights, emphasizing that Fiji’s commitments to the International Labour Organisation are being overlooked.
Pryde placed the blame for these troubling circumstances squarely on the acting Chief Justice and the decisions made by the Judicial Services Commission (JSC), which he claims led to his salary and benefits being suspended prior to the tribunal’s hearings. He alleges that these actions not only interfere with the tribunal’s proceedings but may also represent a form of contempt.
The Prime Minister’s public support for Pryde’s call to have his salary reinstated was also mentioned, which he believes further underscores the fairness of his request. Pryde firmly stated that he will not be coerced into resigning or participating in the hearing without the means to defend himself appropriately.
In conclusion, Pryde has requested that the tribunal refer the matter back to the President for consideration of an extension until his salary suspension is addressed. He indicated his readiness to continue with the legal proceedings as soon as his salary and entitlements are restored.
This situation highlights the importance of ensuring that legal proceedings are conducted fairly, with all parties receiving adequate support to defend themselves. Upholding the principles of justice and equity is crucial for maintaining public trust in the judicial system. As the matter unfolds, it will be essential to monitor how the tribunal and legal authorities respond to these concerns, potentially validating or addressing Pryde’s claims to ensure fairness.
Leave a comment