Christopher Pryde, the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, has announced that he will not attend the upcoming Tribunal set for December 2 to address allegations of misconduct. His decision stems from financial difficulties caused by the Tribunal’s refusal to reinstate his salary, which he claims is crucial for mounting an adequate defense.
In a letter directed to Tribunal chairman Justice Anare Tuilevuka, Pryde expressed concern that his inability to financially support his legal representation constituted a violation of the fairness mandated by the President in Tribunal proceedings. He argued that this situation contravenes international labor conventions that Fiji has ratified.
Pryde attributes the troubling circumstances to the acting Chief Justice, who chairs the Judicial Services Commission (JSC), and criticizes the Commission for suspending his salary prior to the hearing. He insists that without the restoration of his salary and entitlements, he cannot fairly participate in the proceedings. Despite expressing his willingness to present his case and defend against the allegations, Pryde remains firm in his stance that his financial limitations impede his participation.
In light of these developments, Pryde is calling for Justice Tuilevuka to refer the compensation issue back to President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu and Acting Chief Justice Salesi Temo. He believes that restoring his salary is essential for justice to prevail and uphold natural justice principles.
While questions posed to the JSC’s Acting Chief Justice have not yet received a response, Pryde’s situation raises significant discussions about the intersection of justice, financial resources, and the rights of individuals in legal proceedings.
This scenario underscores the importance of fair treatment and the provision of adequate resources necessary for defendants to defend themselves effectively. Moreover, it points to the need for institutions to ensure that all parties involved in legal matters have the means to participate fully, reflecting the broader values of justice and equity.
In moving forward, it is hoped that a resolution can be reached that allows both the Tribunal and Mr. Pryde to address the issues at hand fairly, paving the way for a just outcome.
Leave a comment