Christopher Pryde, the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, has made it clear that he will neither resign nor participate in the upcoming tribunal hearing scheduled for December 2. His refusal stems from what he claims as an “unfair” suspension of his salary, which he argues has restricted his ability to secure legal representation.
In a statement regarding the tribunal’s communication on November 21, Pryde expressed concern about the fairness of the proceedings, questioning how a hearing can be just when he is unable to defend himself adequately due to a lack of financial resources. He contends that this situation not only undermines the tribunal’s mandate of fairness as outlined by the President but also violates international conventions to which Fiji is a signatory.
Pryde has criticized the Acting Chief Justice Salesi Temo and the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) for their roles in his suspended salary, claiming their actions interfere with the tribunal process and amount to contempt. He noted that Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has publicly supported his call for the reinstatement of his salary, which he believes aligns with fair and logical perspectives on the matter.
Stressing his refusal to be coerced into resigning, Pryde emphasized his right to a fair defense. He stated, “It is axiomatic that I should have the right to adequately defend myself before the tribunal,” highlighting a clear breach of natural justice if denied this ability. He affirmed his willingness to engage in the tribunal proceedings if his salary and contractual entitlements are restored, allowing him the means to defend himself ambitiously.
On the JSC’s updates about the upcoming tribunal, Temo maintained a reserved position, stating he cannot comment on the specifics of the tribunal due to its legal nature.
This situation indicates ongoing tensions within the judicial system in Fiji, reflecting broader issues regarding governance and the rights of public officials. While challenges persist, Pryde’s stance points to a collective yearning for due process, transparency, and a system that values fair representation for all individuals in legal disputes. It is hoped that the resolution of this matter will pave the way for clearer policies and protections for public officials in the future.
Leave a comment