Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka faced rigorous questioning yesterday during a two-hour session at the Commission of Inquiry (COI) concerning the contentious appointment of Barbara Malimali as the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) Commissioner. His dual capacities as Prime Minister and chair of the Constitutional Office Commission (COC) required him to provide insights at the old parliament complex in Veiuto, Suva.

The closed two-week hearing will feature testimony from 35 significant witnesses as it examines the circumstances surrounding Malimali’s appointment, which took place on September 5, 2024. Justice David Ashton-Lewis, an esteemed Australian jurist and Supreme Court judge, has been leading the inquiry since his appointment as the sole commissioner last October. He is assisted in these proceedings by senior barrister Janet Mason.

The COI’s goal is to investigate whether Malimali’s appointment was influenced by any improper or unlawful means, especially considering the context of ongoing FICAC investigations involving notable figures, including members of Parliament, ministers, and senior public officials.

In comments to the media, Prime Minister Rabuka conveyed his anticipation of tough questioning, emphasizing the necessity of uncovering the truth. He remarked that many inquiries were based on his own affidavit. Justice Ashton-Lewis shared a favorable assessment of the inaugural session, noting Rabuka’s readiness to engage meaningfully in the inquiry. The commissioner noted, “It has been so positive… The Prime Minister acted commendably,” and confirmed the hearing would proceed until January 16, with ongoing evaluations of witness testimonies.

Mason reiterated the commissioner’s insights, expressing contentment with the inquiry’s initial stages and emphasizing the importance of tackling the accumulated information. Meanwhile, Malimali’s attorney, Tanya Waqanika, opted to refrain from commenting on the proceedings.

The Opposition remains steadfast in its quest for transparency regarding the appointment process. Its leader, Inia Seruiratu, indicated his intent to testify in the upcoming sessions, asserting the necessity of revealing whether proper procedures were adhered to during Malimali’s selection. Attorney-General Graham Leung, who previously supported Malimali’s appointment, is scheduled to take the stand later this week, emphasizing the inquiry’s independence.

This inquiry represents a significant opportunity for Fiji to reinforce its commitment to good governance and accountability. It illustrates a transparent approach to addressing concerns about political influence, which is essential for restoring public confidence in institutions.

In summary, the inquiry into the appointment of FICAC Commissioner Barbara Malimali has commenced, featuring key testimonies and a public push for clarity and integrity within the process. The involvement of high-level officials underscores the gravity of the investigation and its potential impact on Fiji’s governance structure moving forward.