The Commission of Inquiry (COI) in Fiji has reiterated its call for the suspension of Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) Commissioner Barbara Malimali, citing concerns that her continued influence could undermine the independence of the inquiry and the safety of witnesses. Janet Mason, the counsel assisting the COI, highlighted that Malimali’s presence might intimidate FICAC staff who are scheduled to testify in the inquiry.
This renewed push for suspension stems from Malimali’s recent objections to the access of FICAC documents by key witness Kuliniasi Saumi, who had previously been dismissed by Malimali after providing an affidavit containing crucial evidence related to her arrest. The COI has underscored the necessity for witnesses to be able to give testimony freely, without the fear of retaliation, as part of its ongoing commitment to uphold the integrity of the inquiry process.
Mason criticized Malimali’s decision to take voluntary leave, arguing that it does not eliminate the possibility of interference. Additionally, in an email obtained by the media, Malimali expressed concerns over Saumi’s access to the necessary documents and proposed that other FICAC staff members handle these materials, complicating the situation further.
The COI has reached out to Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka and President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu to discuss potential legal avenues for addressing the issue of Malimali’s involvement. This situation is compounded by serious allegations regarding Malimali’s conduct during her tenure as Chairperson of the Electoral Commission and her role at FICAC.
Amid these developments, there is a shared sense of hope that the inquiry may lead to necessary reforms aimed at improving accountability and transparency within Fiji’s governmental framework. By prioritizing witness protection and establishing clearer guidelines for public officials’ conduct, the inquiry offers a vital opportunity for progress in the fight against corruption in Fiji.
This situation reflects significant challenges within the governance structure of the country, yet it also points to the possibility for positive change and the reinforcement of ethical standards across institutions. The focus on restoring integrity within FICAC and ensuring accountability may foster greater public trust in systems designed to uphold justice and democratic values.
Leave a comment