Opposition MP Premila Kumar has criticized Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka for his decision to oversee the Immigration Department and the Fiji Police Force himself, suggesting that it may lead to him becoming overwhelmed with responsibilities. She raised questions about Rabuka’s faith in the competence of his ministers by asking why so much power was consolidated in one office when the government has a large ministerial team.
Kumar emphasized that effective governance relies on strong leadership and that managing multiple critical portfolios—such as Foreign Affairs, Climate Change, and now Immigration and Police—could hinder the Prime Minister’s ability to focus adequately on each issue. She pointed out that Fiji is currently grappling with significant challenges, including the rising cost of living, healthcare system struggles, drug-related issues, and a brain drain in key sectors like education and health.
Kumar urged for a model that empowers individual ministers to take charge of their specific areas, asserting that this approach would lead to better attention and results for every ministry.
In response, Prime Minister Rabuka defended his decision, explaining that he temporarily took on additional portfolios due to ongoing investigations within the Immigration Department. He noted that this arrangement would only last while Pio Tikoduadua is under scrutiny. Rabuka also reminded Kumar that her party had previously employed a similar approach when they had one minister handling multiple responsibilities.
The Immigration Department has recently come under fire due to allegations concerning potentially unauthorized passport issuances linked to the Grace Road human rights controversies. Tikoduadua’s decision to step aside was meant to ensure an impartial inquiry into these allegations.
Rabuka indicated that the transition of the Immigration and Police portfolios under his management would officially take effect on December 1, following a considered approach to the ongoing situation. Tikoduadua retains his roles in defence, veteran affairs, and military matters.
In summary, the discussion highlights the tension between consolidating power for immediate oversight and the potential risks of lacking focused governance. This situation presents an opportunity for leadership reevaluation and could pave the way for a more structured approach in future governance, fostering a more collaborative environment among ministers. As the government navigates these challenges, it might lead to a renewed commitment to address pressing national issues effectively.
Leave a comment