Your Window To Fiji And Beyond.

Illustration of Tribunal decision ‘not mine’

PM Shrugs Off Tribunal Responsibility Amid DPP Controversy

Spread the love

Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has reiterated that the decision to initiate another tribunal to investigate claims against the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Christopher Pryde, is outside his authority. Rabuka clarified that such decisions rest solely with the Judicial Legal Service Commission and not with the Cabinet or his office, emphasizing, “If there’s another tribunal, it will not be my responsibility; it’s outside my area of responsibility.”

This statement follows Pryde’s claims about the possibility of a new tribunal being convened to address allegations against him. In response to concerns regarding the financial implications of such tribunals, Rabuka acknowledged that they are a part of governmental operations and indicated that if deemed necessary, establishment of a tribunal would proceed. He also underscored the importance of protecting classified information, warning that unauthorized disclosures could lead to investigations for breaches of confidentiality.

Rabuka’s remarks come on the heels of a previous tribunal that cleared Pryde of misconduct allegations, reinstating him to his position and restoring lost pay and benefits. This first tribunal’s proceedings established important precedents regarding the interpretation of “misbehaviour” within Fiji’s legal framework, crucial for ensuring accountability in judicial processes.

Overall, Rabuka’s statements reflect a broader commitment to due process and transparency in governance, which is vital for fostering public trust in Fiji’s legal institutions. The ongoing discussions about accountability signal a positive trajectory for the country’s legal landscape, indicating a hopeful future where integrity in governance is strengthened through clear roles and responsibilities.

By emphasizing the importance of due diligence and the need to maintain confidentiality, the Prime Minister is reinforcing confidence in Fiji’s judicial systems. As the nation navigates these complex dynamics, such commitments serve as a constructive sign of evolving governance aimed at reinforcing public trust in its legal institutions.


Comments

Leave a comment

Latest News

Search the website