Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka faced a challenging two-hour questioning session at the Commission of Inquiry (COI) concerning the contentious appointment of Barbara Malimali as Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC). This inquiry is particularly significant, as it aims to investigate whether her appointment was influenced by improper or illegal pressures, particularly in light of ongoing FICAC investigations involving high-profile individuals.
During this closed hearing, which is taking place over two weeks, Mr. Rabuka, who also chairs the Constitutional Office Commission, appeared at the old parliament complex in Veiuto, Suva. Justice David Ashton-Lewis is leading the inquiry as the sole commissioner, supported by senior barrister Janet Mason.
Mr. Rabuka expressed anticipation for the tough nature of the inquiry, emphasizing the importance of uncovering the truth behind the appointment process. Despite the pressures, he described the session as a necessary step in fostering transparency. Justice Ashton-Lewis noted the session’s positivity and Mr. Rabuka’s commendable engagement, indicating a constructive atmosphere in the inquiry.
The inquiry aims to examine whether vested interests had a role in the appointment of Ms. Malimali, particularly given the implications of the ongoing investigations that could involve members of parliament and senior public officials.
The Opposition, represented by leader Inia Seruiratu, is keen on ensuring the truth is brought to light, with upcoming testimonies from key figures including Attorney-General Graham Leung, who endorsed Ms. Malimali’s appointment.
This heightened level of scrutiny reflects a commitment to the principles of transparency and accountability within Fiji’s governance, which is a hopeful development for the nation. Such initiatives serve as a reminder that democratic processes hold significant value and that efforts to uphold integrity can lead to a more trustworthy political landscape.
The inquiry, which continues until January 16, will be instrumental in shaping public confidence in governmental institutions. It is a crucial moment for discerning the integrity of the appointment process and ensuring that the rule of law is upheld.
Leave a comment