Pacific Islands Forum FFMM in Suva focuses on unity, climate resilience amid external pressures
Leaders from 18 Pacific nations gathered in Suva for this year’s Pacific Islands Forum Foreign Ministers’ Meeting to sharpen the region’s priorities ahead of the Leaders’ Meeting later this year. Forum Secretary-General Baron Waqa outlined a packed agenda that centers on peace and security, climate change, and people-centered development, emphasizing that the daily lives of Pacific citizens must remain the core of regional action.
We must safeguard our region as a zone of peace, amid evolving geopolitical dynamics, Waqa said. Our discussions also put people at the centre. People-centred development means ensuring our collective efforts improve the daily lives of Pacific citizens. He highlighted critical issues ranging from the legacy of nuclear challenges to the management of marine resources, insisting that climate change will be a major focus as Pacific nations mobilize around outcomes expected from COP31, the first Pacific COP hosted by Australia. Ocean and environmental stewardship were described as essential, with talks touching on deep-sea minerals and the sustainable management of marine resources, informed by ongoing dialogue on these new frontiers.
Speaking to reporters before the meeting, New Zealand Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters voiced concerns about growing external influence within the Forum. His comments come as the Solomon Islands, the host of this year’s Leaders’ Meeting, have restricted attendance to 21 dialogue partners, excluding some longtime partners like the United States and China. Peters drew a parallel with the Forum’s 2021 Micronesian split, warning that outside pressures threaten regional unity. Outsiders, he said, should come with respect for those inside the Forum, and plans to address the issue will be tabled on the agenda to prevent further strain. Peters stressed that aid assistance is welcome, but observer status at meetings should not be taken for granted, arguing that such dynamics could undermine the Forum’s cohesion.
Reaffirming the importance of unity and the traditional Pacific approach, Peters described the Pacific Way as built on respect, unity, and discretion, adding that “we’ll keep our mouths shut when we should.” The Suva meeting is seen as the final high-level opportunity to refine priorities before the Leaders’ Meeting in Honiara, Solomon Islands, and to ensure the regional architecture keeps pace with rapid geopolitical shifts.
What this means for the region
– The exclusion of 21 donor countries, including some major powers, tests the Forum’s ability to maintain unity while securing essential climate finance and development support.
– Pacific leaders are emphasizing a Pacific-led path, focusing on climate resilience, the blue economy, and regional security, while seeking practical engagement with a diversified set of partners in a way that respects sovereignty.
– Initiatives already on the radar include the 2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent, reforms to regional governance, and mechanisms like the Pacific Resilience Facility and the Pacific Resilience and Emergency Disaster Fund. How these programs are funded and implemented could be affected by changing attendance and external involvement.
– The discussions also reflect a broader debate about the balance between inclusive dialogue with traditional and new partners and maintaining the Forum’s central role as the driver of regional priorities.
Outlook and value for readers
– If Pacific leaders maintain a united, Pacific-led approach, the Leaders’ Meeting in Honiara could translate ministerial decisions into concrete actions on climate finance, resilience, and sustainable development.
– Sustained unity may bolster the Forum’s credibility as the central hub for regional cooperation, helping to mobilize resources for climate adaptation, blue economy projects, and governance reforms.
– However, continued external pressure and selective participation could complicate negotiations and slow progress on key files, underscoring the need for clear, region-led decision-making that aligns with the Pacific Way.
Commentary and context
– The Suva FFMM highlights the ongoing tension between sovereignty and regional solidarity in a multipolar global order. Leaders are navigating how to maintain inclusive dialogue and shared priorities while accommodating strategic interests of external partners.
– The future role of topics such as deep-sea mining, West Papua, and New Caledonia, alongside the evolving concept of a “Zone of Peace” now often discussed as the “Ocean of Peace,” will be watched closely as indicators of whether the Forum can stay focused and deliver tangible outcomes.
Summary
Leaders and ministers are using the Suva gathering to reaffirm a Pacific-led agenda that centers on climate resilience, sustainable development, and regional security, even as external powers seek a larger footprint in the region. The outcome will hinge on maintaining unity, practical cooperation, and clear, leader-driven decisions that directly benefit Pacific peoples, with the Leaders’ Meeting in Honiara serving as the critical test of the Forum’s ability to translate consensus into action.
Additional value for readers
– Context: The discussions operate within the broader framework of the 2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent and ongoing debates about regional governance reforms and resilience funding.
– Key terms to watch: Pacific Way, Pacific Resilience Facility, Ocean of Peace, COP31, deep-sea minerals, and the balance between sovereignty and regional solidarity.
– What to monitor next: any decisions on attendance rules for donor partners, progress on regional architecture reforms, and concrete commitments for climate finance and resilience initiatives ahead of the Leaders’ Meeting.
Leave a comment