A coalition of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) has expressed strong criticism of Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka’s recent decision to create additional ministerial and assistant ministerial positions in Fiji. The NGO Coalition on Human Rights (NGOCHR) denounced the reshuffle as politically opportunistic, raising concerns about transparency, accountability, and the strain it could place on the nation’s resources.

In a formal statement, the NGOCHR articulated their apprehensions regarding the abrupt changes in government portfolios and the potential financial burden these positions could impose on public finances. The coalition noted that the costs associated with the newly appointed officials—including salaries, allowances, and operational expenditures—could significantly affect an already fragile economy.

They called attention to the timing of the reshuffle and its implications, questioning whether it aims to consolidate power ahead of the upcoming 2026 elections rather than genuinely serve the interests of the Fijian populace. They described the expansion as a “slap in the face” to hardworking citizens struggling with economic hardship, emphasizing that public funds should not support unnecessary political maneuvers.

Moreover, the NGOs urged Prime Minister Rabuka to reverse the government expansion decision and to focus efforts instead on pressing issues such as rising poverty levels, gender injustices, and the ecological crisis exacerbated by climate change. They reaffirmed that Fijians deserve leadership that prioritizes the public good rather than personal and political self-interest.

These concerns echo sentiments raised by various opposition politicians, including former leaders like Mahendra Chaudhry, who also criticized the cabinet expansion as financially imprudent and detrimental to addressing urgent socio-economic challenges. Critiques from opposition members emphasize the need for accountability and transparency, not only to restore public trust but also to enhance governance.

While the political landscape may be contentious, there is a silver lining. The backlash against these disturbing trends highlights a vibrant civic engagement and a demand for reform that could ultimately spur a more accountable governance framework. Advocates for change believe this situation presents a critical opportunity for the government to realign its focus in accordance with the citizens’ actual needs, paving the way for improved service delivery and a stronger relationship with the community.

In conclusion, as Fiji navigates through political shifts, the hope remains that constructive dialogue and public scrutiny will drive the necessary reforms, ensuring a government that truly serves the interests of its people. Effective governance and accountability could lead to positive changes, fostering social stability and economic recovery for the nation.