David Seymour, New Zealand’s Deputy Prime Minister, has firmly dismissed allegations that Pacific communities are disproportionately dependent on welfare. In response to questions during an interview on Pacific Mornings, he emphasized that a significant number of Pasifika individuals are actively contributing to the economy by working and paying taxes, rather than relying solely on state support.
Seymour highlighted the need for a smaller, more efficient government, advocating for reductions in bureaucratic structures. Currently, New Zealand has 43 departments and 30 ministers, a figure that he argues is excessive compared to countries like Ireland, Norway, and Singapore. He believes that scaling back the government could ultimately create more economic opportunities for all citizens, allowing them to earn and spend with greater freedom.
His remarks come as New Zealand approaches the national elections, scheduled for November 7. Seymour’s ACT Party has positioned itself on a platform of reform aimed at streamlining government operations. He compared New Zealand’s position to that of Argentina, citing President Javier Milei’s recent transformative actions that are projected to stimulate economic growth.
On the other hand, Labour MP Tangi Utikere has countered Seymour’s assertions by stressing the importance of prioritizing frontline services and addressing the growing cost of living for families. Utikere pointed to Labour’s commitment to provide three free doctor’s visits annually as a concrete example of support for struggling communities. He critiqued the current government, arguing that it has become disconnected from the economic challenges facing many New Zealanders.
The ongoing debate reveals the contrasting perspectives within New Zealand’s political landscape regarding the balance between economic reform and social welfare. As the election approaches, the tension around these issues underscores a significant divide in how different parties envision the role of government in supporting their constituents amid a changing economy.
Leave a comment