The Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) and its secretariat represent a complex organization that requires significant time to fully grasp. This political entity strives to balance the diverse interests of its 18 member countries while enhancing regional unity. The Forum operates under a blend of formal regulations and informal customs, often referred to as the “Pacific way.”
Having served in various roles at the Forum Secretariat, including as the Director of Governance and Engagement, my experience spans a decade marked by significant challenges and achievements in regionalism. For me, regionalism primarily focuses on fostering collaboration among Pacific nations at all levels.
When I first joined the Forum Secretariat, relations with Fiji had soured following its suspension in 2009, leading to tensions among leaders that impacted the organization’s functions. There were even discussions about possibly moving the Secretariat to Samoa as regional operations increasingly occurred outside its purview, thereby diminishing its authority. At that time, the Secretariat faced criticism for being disconnected from the communities it aimed to serve.
A critical review in 2013 highlighted the need for revitalizing regionalism, indicating that the Forum had “lost its politics.” It became clear that strengthening the Forum’s role as a facilitator for political dialogue among leaders on challenging issues was necessary. However, the challenge lies in the fact that leaders convene only once a year, experience frequent political changes, and numerous regional meetings complicate coordination efforts.
While Secretary General Tuiloma Neroni Slade faced challenges during Fiji’s suspension, he worked diligently to protect the Secretariat’s integrity. Dame Meg Taylor, succeeding him, opened discussions to include broader stakeholders, especially civil society, which helped reshape the Forum’s approach and led to the development of the Blue Pacific narrative. This narrative shifted the focus from mere cooperation to emphasizing the strategic unity of Pacific nations.
The culmination of these discussions was the 2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent, which underscores the importance of having a clear strategic plan for regionalism. Two persistent political issues have emerged during my tenure: membership dynamics and the recognition of Taiwan. Fiji’s re-engagement with the Forum began only in 2019, but it later played an essential role in resolving internal rifts among Micronesian members who considered withdrawing.
Moreover, the admission of New Caledonia and French Polynesia as full members in 2016 marked a significant shift in the Forum’s membership structure, straying from its original political grouping approach. Similarly, Taiwan’s status within the Forum has become increasingly contentious, causing potential divisions, especially given the rise of geopolitical tensions in the region.
As Secretary General Baron Waqa assumes leadership, he will navigate these divisive issues, collaborating closely with the Forum Chair and the Troika in addressing topics such as deep-sea mining, human rights, and continuing concerns regarding Taiwan’s role.
Despite the challenges, regionalism in the Pacific transcends procedural outputs; it fundamentally hinges on relationships and human connections. The dynamics of Pacific regionalism are influenced not only by member nations’ political leadership but also by their people’s communal values. Although regionalism presents its obstacles, including resource allocation and competing national priorities, it remains vital for the Pacific’s development objectives.
Finally, as I reflect on my experience at the Forum Secretariat, I recognize both my growth and the challenges faced by the organization itself. The work environment can be demanding, yet the bond formed with colleagues—as part of a larger “Pacific family”—provides motivation to persevere. In this context, regionalism is an ongoing journey that necessitates dedication, adaptability, and a commitment to collective growth among the Pacific nations.