Landowners in Namosi are maintaining their firm opposition to the renewal of the Namosi Joint Venture Special Prospecting License (SPL) 1420, in light of a request from the Minister for Lands and Mineral Resources, Filimoni Vosarogo, for a three-year extension. Vosarogo explained that the company intends to renew the license not for further exploration, but to analyze existing data and complete necessary documentation. He emphasized that a valid SPL is crucial for the company to meet legal obligations and interact effectively with government agencies.
However, the Mataqali Nabukebuke, represented by spokesperson Petero Saunivalu, firmly rejected the renewal request. Saunivalu indicated that their business arm is already engaged in sustainable practices, particularly carbon trading on 3,000 acres of leased land, which he argued is more aligned with the long-term interests of the community. He remarked, “We made our decision a long time ago to say no to the renewal of SPL 1420. We have seen the harm done by prospecting, and we want to protect our land and community.”
This situation showcases the ongoing tension between potential development and the rights of local landowners in Namosi. The Ministry is under pressure to navigate these conflicting interests, as it seeks a solution respecting both the landowners’ wishes and the aspirations of the mining company.
This scenario echoes broader themes highlighted in previous discussions surrounding mining activities in the area, where local communities have expressed significant concerns about environmental impacts and the importance of inclusive dialogue in decision-making processes. LAMA (Lomani Au Maroroi Au), a representative group, has previously criticized Vosarogo for perceived unprofessionalism and a lack of genuine engagement with the community, which they believe undermines the collective rights of the landowners.
It is vital for the government to foster open lines of communication with all stakeholders involved, as this could lead to more sustainable and mutually beneficial decisions in the future. A collaborative approach has the potential to ensure respect for community rights while considering development needs, which is crucial for balancing tradition and progress.
Leave a comment