MPs Called to Act: Will they Prove Integrity After Pay Rise Vote?

Former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum has called for greater transparency and accountability from Members of Parliament (MPs) regarding their stance on the recent pay rise for government officials. In May 2024, a vote was held where 40 MPs supported the salary increases for the President, Speaker, Ministers, Assistant Ministers, and MPs. However, seven MPs were opposed, and five chose to abstain.

Mr. Sayed-Khaiyum expressed concerns about the integrity of those who voted against the increase or abstained. He argued that if these MPs genuinely opposed the pay rise, they should demonstrate their convictions by donating the additional funds they would receive to charity. He suggested that they could either give directly to charitable causes or establish a trust to benefit the wider community.

Highlighting the importance of transparency, Mr. Sayed-Khaiyum emphasized that MPs should publicly report any donations made. He positioned this as an opportunity for them to prove their commitment to the welfare of ordinary Fijians. He warned that failing to take these actions would compromise their moral standing, placing them on par with those who voted in favor of the pay increase, especially as many citizens continue to experience financial hardships.

In his conclusion, Mr. Sayed-Khaiyum urged MPs to take meaningful action that would reflect their priorities and align with the interests of the Fijian populace. He expressed hope that this situation could foster a culture of accountability and integrity in governance.

This call for action is a reminder of the significant responsibility that public officials hold in representing the interests of their constituents. By encouraging such measures, it could lead to a more engaged and compassionate political environment.

Summary: Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum has challenged MPs who opposed or abstained from voting on a recent pay rise to show accountability by donating their additional funds to charity. He called for transparency in their actions, stating that genuine opposition should include public disclosure of any donations made, thereby emphasizing the need for moral leadership in government.