Retired Captain Savenaca Kadavi recently expressed his willingness to assist the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions in the case against Tevita Kapawale, who faces serious charges including five counts of murder. However, Kadavi stated that his offer was declined when he approached Eoghn Samisoni from the prosecution team.
The proceedings took place before High Court Judge Justice Daniel Tuiqereqere, where Kadavi provided crucial insights regarding the operational aspects of the fishing vessel MV Tiro, associated with the case. He detailed that a person intending to sink the ship must possess specialized knowledge and tools, emphasizing that such actions require experience. He explained that entering confined spaces, such as the fish hold or refrigeration compartments, poses severe risks due to the lack of ventilation, indicating that survival would be almost impossible beyond a couple of hours.
In response, prosecution attorney Eoghn Samisoni challenged Kadavi’s credibility, questioning his lack of prior experience aboard the vessel and suggesting that his testimony lacked specificity because he was present in court while prosecution witnesses testified. Nevertheless, Kadavi asserted his independence and desire to offer expert knowledge.
Tevita Kapawale is currently remanded in custody as he faces five murder charges alongside an attempted murder charge and criminal intimidation regarding the deaths of Benjamin Mattaputty, Eme Warma, Alfat Kodri, Samuela Sukera, and Qiritavabea Cagilabakomeli, as well as the attempted murder of Kaminieli Tucama.
This high-profile case raises significant questions about maritime safety and legal accountability amid serious allegations. The trial has been adjourned until Wednesday for further proceedings, while many within the Fijian community hope for justice and clarity through proper legal processes. The ongoing trial highlights the essential role of expert testimonies in uncovering the truth and serves as a reminder of the complexities and responsibilities involved in the judicial system.
Leave a comment