Lawyers for the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) and former finance officer Sarika Devi Raj have been granted more time to resolve issues concerning essential disclosures in Raj’s ongoing legal case. This decision took place during a session at the Suva Magistrate’s Court, where Raj sought a modification to her bail conditions, specifically asking for the removal of the requirement to frequently report to the FICAC office.

Raj faces serious allegations implicating her in actions that allegedly led to an improper gain of $182,404.99 between September 20, 2019, and June 19, 2020. It is accused that she failed to disclose her status as the sole proprietor of Maleka Investment, which is a vendor for the Republic of Fiji Military Forces (RFMF), allegedly harming the interests of the organization.

In court, Raj’s lawyer, Mohammed Saneem, claimed that FICAC misled the court regarding the execution of a search warrant and that necessary documents requested by the RFMF’s legal director were not adequately provided. He raised critical questions about the authority within this case, challenging whether the RFMF or the court held precedence.

FICAC’s lawyer, Lavinia Ravuikadavu, denied any claims of misleading the court. She clarified that while FICAC executed the search warrant, they possessed over 150 manuals and instructions from the RFMF and needed specific document requests from Saneem. Ravuikadavu noted that this situation had been communicated in a letter dated December 17, 2024.

Magistrate Pulekeria Low highlighted the necessity for FICAC to supply all relevant documents, given their role as the charging entity. Saneem has been granted 14 days to submit another application for the required documents, followed by an additional 14 days for FICAC to respond. Both parties are expected back in court on January 23.

This ongoing case underscores the complexities involved in legal proceedings surrounding corruption allegations, emphasizing the commitment to due process and transparency within Fiji’s judicial system. It represents a crucial step towards accountability in government operations and fosters a hopeful outlook for justice in Fiji. The extended timeline for addressing necessary disclosures illustrates a dedication to ensuring a thorough examination of the issues at hand, which is vital for maintaining the integrity of public service.