Lawyers representing the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) and Sarika Devi Raj, a former finance officer of the Republic of Fiji Military Forces (RFMF), have been granted additional time to resolve critical disclosure issues in Raj’s ongoing legal case. This decision was made during a session at the Suva Magistrate’s Court where Raj sought to modify her bail conditions, particularly asking for the removal of her obligation to regularly report to the FICAC office.

Raj is facing allegations of participating in acts that allegedly resulted in an improper financial gain amounting to $182,404.99 between September 20, 2019, and June 19, 2020. The accusations claim that Raj failed to disclose her ownership of Maleka Investment, a vendor for the RFMF, which is said to have harmed the organization’s interests.

During the proceedings, Raj’s attorney, Mohammed Saneem, contended that FICAC had misled the court concerning the execution of a search warrant and that necessary documents requested by the RFMF’s legal director were not adequately provided. He raised significant questions regarding the authority in the case, challenging whether the RFMF or the court should take precedence.

In response, FICAC lawyer Lavinia Ravuikadavu denied any allegations of misleading the court, clarifying that while FICAC executed the search warrant, they required specific document requests from Saneem, as the RFMF has over 150 manuals and instructions. She noted that this communication was relayed to Saneem in a letter dated December 17, 2024.

Magistrate Pulekeria Low emphasized the necessity for FICAC to provide all documents essential to their case, given their role as the charging entity. Saneem has been granted a further 14 days to submit an additional request for documentation, after which FICAC will have an additional 14 days to respond. Both parties are set to reconvene in court on January 23.

This case illustrates the complexities involved in legal proceedings concerning corruption allegations and highlights the commitment to transparency and due process in Fiji’s judicial system. It represents a significant step toward accountability within government operations, fostering a hopeful outlook for justice in Fiji. The extended timeline for addressing necessary disclosures indicates a dedication to ensuring a thorough examination of the issues at hand, which is vital for maintaining the integrity of public service and the rule of law.