Former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum has refuted claims that his discussion with suspended Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Christopher Pryde was connected to the ongoing investigation against him by the Criminal Investigations Department (CID). During the initial day of Pryde’s tribunal hearing at the Court of Appeal in Suva, Sayed-Khaiyum clarified that their exchange was personal, primarily revolving around their children, Emma Pryde and Ibrahim Sayed-Khaiyum.
The conversation occurred at a diplomatic event on February 28, 2023, while the CID was already probing Sayed-Khaiyum’s activities, with the pertinent case file handed to the DPP’s office at that time. Pryde has been on full pay suspension since April 2023, pending a tribunal following allegations of misbehavior. He has indicated a reluctance to participate in the tribunal’s proceedings unless his salary is reinstated.
On the stand, Sayed-Khaiyum highlighted that he interacted with several other dignitaries at the event, and described how a photo presented as evidence by Minister for Justice Siromi Turaga unfairly portrayed him as solely engaged with Pryde, excluding others from the context. He expressed uncertainty about the exact duration of their conversation and firmly denied any discussion regarding his investigation.
The tribunal also addressed allegations regarding a US$1,000 monthly superannuation payment to the suspended DPP without proper authorization. Sayed-Khaiyum explained that remuneration for the DPP is determined by the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) along with the Office of the Attorney-General, asserting he had a limited role in this regard.
Turaga, who is the complainant in the case, testified that he witnessed Pryde and Sayed-Khaiyum engaged in a prolonged and inappropriate conversation, particularly in light of the sensitive nature of the ongoing investigation. He described Sayed-Khaiyum’s tone during the conversation as dominating, while Pryde appeared to acquiesce. Afterward, Pryde acknowledged his misjudgment and expressed remorse, writing an apology to Turaga on March 6, 2023. Following the incident, Turaga filed a formal complaint with the JSC on March 29, after consulting with legal colleagues.
The tribunal hearing has been adjourned until today, indicating that this case is drawing considerable attention and may lead to further developments in the legal landscape of Fiji.
In summary, this situation highlights the complexities and challenges involved in the intersection of personal relationships and professional duties, particularly in high-stakes legal environments. As these proceedings unfold, they may prompt broader discussions regarding ethical standards within governing bodies and the importance of transparency in judicial processes. It is hopeful that this case will lead to improved protocols that reinforce ethical conduct among public officials, ensuring accountability and integrity in the legal system.
Leave a comment