Chief Registrar Tomasi Bainivalu has urged former Deputy Commissioner of FICAC, Francis Puleiwai, to refrain from mimicking the actions of the Prime Minister, senior opposition figures, or members of the press if she chooses to lodge a complaint against any legal professional.
In an email obtained by FijiLive, Bainivalu emphasized the importance of maintaining respect for the independence of his office when handling complaints from the public. He stated, “I ask that you do not make a mockery of the legal system by copying all your complaints to the media, the Honourable Prime Minister, and senior members of the Opposition. I cannot understand that.”
Bainivalu assured Puleiwai that her complaint would be treated with the same respect and seriousness as others, asserting that her case holds no special significance.
The complaint in question is aimed at investigating FICAC Commissioner Barbara Malimali over alleged misconduct linked to the improper issuance of a Stop Departure Order. Puleiwai claims that Malimali’s actions appeared intentional, especially since no inquiry is currently underway against her. She further noted that, according to Section 10G(1) of the FICAC Act 2007, her actions are protected from civil or criminal liability. Additionally, Puleiwai pointed out that the Stop Departure Order remains active in the Immigration System and has not been revoked, despite apparent procedural discrepancies.
This ongoing situation underlines the complexities within Fiji’s legal and political landscape, highlighting the need for clear communication and respect for institutional processes. It is crucial for all parties involved to approach the matter diligently, ensuring that justice is served fairly and transparently.
In summary, Bainivalu’s warning to Puleiwai emphasizes the necessity of treating legal complaints with the requisite decorum and independence, while the allegations against Commissioner Malimali spotlight significant governance issues that require careful scrutiny.
This situation also reflects a broader aspiration for accountability and integrity within governmental institutions, which is a vital component in building public confidence in the legal system. The call for respect in these processes is hopeful, as it encourages a culture of constructive dialogue and responsibility.
Leave a comment