Former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum has denied any impropriety regarding a discussion he had with suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Pryde. Speaking in court, Sayed-Khaiyum maintained that their conversation focused solely on personal topics, particularly their families and children, rather than any ongoing investigations by the Criminal Investigations Department.
Sayed-Khaiyum criticized a photo presented as evidence by Justice Minister Siromi Turaga, arguing it misleadingly suggested he was only conversing with Pryde. He stated that they were not isolated during the conversation, as other guests were present nearby. Furthermore, he could not recall the specific length of their discussion but emphasized that it was not merely a brief exchange.
Addressing claims that they discussed his case, Sayed-Khaiyum firmly asserted that no such conversation took place, expressing his offense at the allegations. When questioned about the payments made to Pryde, he stated that this matter falls under the jurisdiction of the Judicial Services Commission and he played a minimal role in those discussions.
Additionally, Sayed-Khaiyum pointed out that he could not remember the payment details for all constitutional office holders, including those for Pryde. He referenced constitutional specifications which dictate proper procedures for such matters.
The tribunal is currently examining allegations of misbehavior and is expected to advise the President regarding Pryde’s potential removal as DPP. The court session resumed this morning and has been adjourned until tomorrow at 10 am.
This situation reflects the complexities surrounding accountability and ethical conduct within government institutions. While the investigation continues, it is essential for all parties involved to uphold legal and ethical standards, fostering transparency and trust in the justice system.
Summary: Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, the former Attorney-General, defended his conversation with suspended DPP Christopher Pryde, stating it was personal and had no connection to ongoing investigations against him. He addressed allegations regarding Pryde’s compensation, deferring responsibility to the Judicial Services Commission and expressing his lack of knowledge about specific payments. The tribunal continues to investigate the situation, with a session scheduled for tomorrow.
Leave a comment