Minister for Lands and Mineral Resources, Filimone Vosarogo, has expressed strong criticism towards Sipiriano Nariva, the chairman of Namosi landowners’ representative group, Lomani Au Maroroi Au (LAMA). Vosarogo accused Nariva of aligning himself with outside activist influences rather than focusing on traditional landowning structures.

In his remarks, Vosarogo noted, “It is unfortunate that this guy sings the tune of his activist masters,” implying that Nariva is not genuinely representing the interests of the Namosi landowners. He indicated that opportunities have been extended to engage in meaningful discussions, particularly with the Mataqali Nabukebuke, an important subgroup within the traditional land governance system, after meeting with Turaga Na Tui Namosi.

The Minister went on to elaborate on the recognized landowner unit structures within iTaukei culture, stating the importance of understanding the roles of Tokatoka, Mataqali, and Yavusa. He questioned Nariva’s legitimacy by asking how LAMA fits into established land governance frameworks. In emphasizing this point, he asked, “What Vanua authority does he hold?” thus challenging the relevance of Nariva’s representation.

This ongoing discourse highlights the crucial interplay between modern activism and traditional land management practices in Fiji. It underscores the need for clear communication and consensus among the various stakeholders involved in land ownership and representation.

As discussions continue, there is hope that constructive dialogue will emerge, leading to a more harmonious relationship between landowners and representatives, fostering understanding and respect for traditional governance structures.