The Acting Chief Justice and Chairperson of the Judicial Service Commission (JSC), Salesi Temo, has characterized the suspended Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), Christopher Pryde’s US$1000 monthly superannuation payment as “theft.” This statement was made during Pryde’s tribunal hearing held at the Veiuto Court Complex, where Justice Temo served as the final witness on the third day of proceedings.
The tribunal is investigating two main allegations against Pryde: first, a photograph of him with former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum taken at a diplomatic event on February 28, 2023, and second, the unauthorized superannuation payments of US$1000 each month, which reportedly have amassed over FJ$288,000 since 2012.
Justice Temo criticized reports suggesting that the payments were merely over-compensation, asserting that they constituted outright theft. He revealed the findings from JSC investigations, which showed a lack of any record indicating that these payments had been authorized. Temo insisted that any such payments would necessitate consultation with the Attorney-General’s office and the President’s approval—neither of which occurred in this instance. The payments were halted in July 2023 when investigations began.
While addressing the photograph issue, Justice Temo remarked that it was imprudent for Pryde to be pictured with someone linked to political turmoil, highlighting the importance of maintaining neutrality for judicial and public office holders. He noted, “Even without evidence of their conversation, a photograph can tell a thousand stories.”
In response to Pryde’s claims of financial strain following his salary suspension, Justice Temo rejected these arguments, pointing out that the Constitution allows for legal aid or self-representation.
The tribunal’s proceedings are set to continue today, as the case unfolds and more details emerge.
This case underscores the importance of accountability and transparency in public office, serving as a reminder that ethical conduct is crucial in maintaining public trust in judicial systems. As the tribunal progresses, it offers an opportunity for the judiciary to reaffirm its commitment to these principles.
Leave a comment