Acting Chief Justice Salesi Temo has labeled the attempts by suspended Director of Public Prosecutions Christopher Pryde to tie his attendance at tribunal hearings to the reinstatement of his salary as “unfair.” During court proceedings, Justice Temo emphasized that Pryde, as a distinguished prosecutor and lawyer in Fiji, is capable of representing himself. He also noted that if Pryde is unable to afford legal counsel, he can seek assistance from Legal Aid.
In addressing the financial aspects of Pryde’s suspension, Justice Temo revealed that since 2012, Pryde has improperly paid himself over $288,000 in superannuation, including a $1,000 monthly payment that he was not entitled to without the necessary approvals from the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) and other relevant authorities. Temo described this financial action as tantamount to theft, highlighting that taxpayers are bearing the burden of this alleged misconduct.
Further scrutinizing the financial management within the DPP, Justice Temo stated that the responsibility for financial approvals rested with Pryde himself, meaning he had the final say on these payments. He confirmed there was no recorded approval for the superannuation payments from the JSC during Pryde’s tenure, which began with his appointment as Solicitor-General in 2012 and extended until July 2024.
The tribunal is currently investigating allegations of misconduct, and recommendations for Pryde’s removal from his position as DPP are being considered. Notably, on February 28, 2023, Pryde was reportedly seen in conversation with prominent figure Sayed-Khaiyum during a critical time when the Criminal Investigation Department was probing him, an issue that was already under the jurisdiction of the DPP.
The tribunal proceedings have been adjourned until 10 am tomorrow, as investigations continue.
In summary, the legal landscape in Fiji is facing significant scrutiny with ongoing investigations into the financial decisions of the suspended DPP, underscoring the importance of accountability within the judiciary. It is a pivotal moment that, while fraught with challenges, also presents an opportunity for reform and enhancing trust in the legal system. As these proceedings unfold, there remains hope for the establishment of clearer governance and adherence to ethical standards in public service.
Leave a comment