Justice Minister Siromi Turaga has emphasized that the 2002 reduction of George Speight’s death sentence to life imprisonment does not serve as a pardon. This statement comes amid growing public scrutiny regarding the legitimacy of Speight’s recent presidential pardon.
Turaga responded to concerns expressed by critics, many of whom questioned whether it is constitutional to pardon Speight twice. He clarified that while the 2002 decision reduced Speight’s sentence, it did not eliminate his conviction or absolve him of the crime.
“The repeal of the death penalty was a legal change applicable to all individuals sentenced to death, not just a specific case,” Turaga explained. The amendment was made in accordance with constitutional prohibitions against hanging and international conventions.
His statements follow last week’s announcement of Speight’s presidential pardon, which, if enacted, would grant him potential freedom after spending over twenty years in prison. Turaga insists that all legal protocols were followed for this release.
He pointed out that the previous government had released several individuals with standing convictions and stated that there is now a clearer process for mercy that did not exist before.
Despite mixed reactions to Speight’s pardon from the public, Turaga believes he is deserving of this opportunity, stating, “It’s not a question of legality; he deserves it like everyone else.”
Ratu Viliame Seruvakula, Chair of the Great Council of Chiefs, expressed that the community should accept the release of the 2000 Coup Leader, asserting he has fulfilled his time. He shared a quote from Nelson Mandela, highlighting the necessity of forgiveness and moving forward.
Last week, Speight was one of seven individuals granted pardons, which included Shane Stevens, a notable figure in the 2000 mutiny at the Queen Elizabeth Barracks.