Justice David Ashton-Lewis, the Sole Commissioner of the ongoing inquiry into the appointment of Barbara Malimali as the Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), has urged the media to maintain fairness and accuracy in their coverage. His plea follows Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka’s concerns over media portrayals of his recent testimony, which described his experience as a “grilling.”

Justice Ashton-Lewis clarified that while the questioning was indeed tough, Rabuka handled it effectively, stating, “He wasn’t given a grilling. The questions were tough, and he answered them perfectly.” He emphasized the high level of professionalism one would expect from someone with Rabuka’s extensive background and experience.

During the inquiry, Rabuka affirmed his dedication to the process but chose not to comment further until the Commission concludes its work. He noted the possibility of extending the inquiry’s timeline if necessary, highlighting the importance of thoroughness in achieving the inquiry’s objectives.

The ongoing inquiry seeks to foster accountability and transparency within Fiji’s governance framework, particularly concerning the method of appointing FICAC’s Commissioner. Up until now, Justice Ashton-Lewis has commended the integrity of the witnesses, stating that there are “no suspicions of lies” so far. Some witnesses are presenting their testimonies virtually due to logistical challenges, especially those traveling from New Zealand and Australia.

This inquiry is seen as a significant opportunity to rebuild public trust in governmental institutions and strengthen ethical standards in public appointments in Fiji. As the hearings progress, there is a hopeful outlook that the Commission’s findings will lead to meaningful reforms, enhancing accountability and transparency in Fiji’s political landscape.

In summary, the Commission of Inquiry not only addresses critical issues surrounding the appointment of FICAC’s Commissioner but also signals a collective commitment to ensuring integrity within public service, potentially restoring confidence among the citizens of Fiji. As these proceedings unfold, there lies optimism for a more transparent and trustworthy governance structure in the country.