Christopher Pryde, the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, has come under scrutiny for allegedly taking a monthly superannuation payment of $1,000 (approximately $2,200) without the necessary approval from the Attorney-General and validation from the President, as mandated by law. Acting Chief Justice Salesi Temo made this assertion during the third day of the tribunal hearing in Suva.
Judge Temo emphasized that this additional payment should not be categorized as an “overpayment,” as some media outlets reported, but rather as “theft.” He expressed confusion over who authorized the superannuation payment, stating, “It should’ve gone through the Judicial Services Commission (JSC), then authorized by the Attorney-General, and then to the President for validation.” He noted that such procedures were not followed in Pryde’s case.
Furthermore, Temo pointed out that expatriates working within the Fijian government typically receive only a 25 percent gratuity payment, indicating that Pryde’s situation suggested strong negotiating skills. He remarked, “He must be a good negotiator with the government to have had $1,000 added to his 25 percent gratuity payment.”
In a letter addressed to Tribunal chairman Justice Anare Tuilevuka, Pryde expressed concerns about not being able to defend himself adequately during the proceedings. Temo challenged this notion, questioning why Pryde, as a prominent prosecutor in Fiji, believed he should have special considerations for his defense. Temo reminded that even high-profile individuals have the option to seek legal aid, reinforcing the idea that Pryde has the right to defend his case.
This ongoing tribunal highlights the importance of legal compliance and adherence to processes within government institutions. It reflects a commitment to upholding the rule of law, ensuring that all officials, regardless of their stature, are accountable for their actions.
In a broader context, this case underscores the necessity for transparency and integrity within public service roles. While it is a moment of reckoning for Pryde, it also presents an opportunity for reform and reinforcing the importance of due process in governance, paving the way for a more accountable system in the future.
In summary, the tribunal is examining the legalities surrounding Christopher Pryde’s additional superannuation payments, with strong assertions from Judge Temo about the infractions involved. The case raises critical questions about governance and the importance of adherence to established protocols.
Leave a comment