The Commission of Inquiry (COI) into the appointment of Barbara Malimali as Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) is currently under way, with Supreme Court Justice David Ashton-Lewis emphasizing that it is too early to determine any wrongdoing related to the judicial bodies involved. Justice Ashton-Lewis stated that comprehensive evidence must be collected before any conclusions can be drawn about the actions of the Judicial Services Commission and the Constitutional Offices Commission regarding Malimali’s appointment made in September 2024.

In an interview, Justice Ashton-Lewis noted, “What looks to be quite innocent in the beginning can change when you get all the evidence,” highlighting the complexity of legal evaluations. His findings will rely on a balance of probabilities rather than a criminal standard of proof, allowing a broader assessment of the circumstances surrounding the appointment.

Counsel Assistant Janet Mason echoed the Justice’s caution, asserting that the inquiry cannot reach premature conclusions as it would imply bias. She elaborated that the COI’s focus is not just on Malimali but on the overall integrity of state-led institutions, particularly in light of ongoing concerns regarding political interference affecting FICAC. Allegations have been raised about vested interests linked to high-profile cases, involving politicians and senior public servants.

Out of the 35 witnesses planned for testimony, seven have already spoken. Prominent figures expected to provide further insights include the Acting Director of Public Prosecutions and various former ministers. The final report from the inquiry is slated for submission to the President and Prime Minister by January 31, 2025.

This inquiry represents a crucial step toward enhancing transparency and accountability in Fiji’s governance. It signals a commitment to ethical practices in public service appointments and addresses public concerns about potential misconduct. As the investigation continues, there is optimism that its findings will foster necessary reforms, which may restore public faith in governmental institutions and promote integrity within Fiji’s political landscape.

In summary, the ongoing inquiry highlights an essential moment for improving governance practices in Fiji, reinforcing the need for accountability and transparency in public appointments. This effort could lead to a brighter future for institutional integrity in the country.