The Prime Minister is urged to establish a Commission of Inquiry under the Commission of Inquiry Act to enhance public trust and demonstrate a strong commitment to the rule of law, constitutional integrity, and the independence of constitutional offices. Former attorney-general Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum made these remarks following allegations by former acting deputy commissioner of FICAC, Francis Puleiwai, suggesting that government ministers and officials were meddling in FICAC’s operations.
Sayed-Khaiyum stated that it is now up to Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka to prove to the Fijian public and international partners his dedication to upholding the rule of law, protecting institutional independence, and ensuring the separation of powers as outlined in the Fijian Constitution.
He emphasized the importance of addressing these issues, noting their potential detrimental impact on investment, investor confidence, and the overall economy, which is not growing as it should and is witnessing an increasing gap between the wealthy and the poor. He also highlighted that the nation’s reputation and credibility with regional and international partners and agencies are at risk.
Sayed-Khaiyum contended that claims denying the constitutional basis for a Commission of Inquiry were misguided. He argued that a focused Commission of Inquiry would not disrupt ongoing independent processes, but stressed that its members should not have any biases or connections to the individuals involved in the allegations. He further insisted that the commission’s terms of reference must be crafted by impartial parties to maintain its credibility.
He warned that failing to meet these conditions would render any inquiry ineffective and could worsen the current situation. Sayed-Khaiyum called on the Prime Minister to take decisive action.
Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka acknowledged that a Commission of Inquiry would be the most suitable and unbiased approach to investigate the claims concerning the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption. He stated that an independent inquiry would be better equipped to confront the issues highlighted by Pulewai, especially those relating to purported ministerial interference. Rabuka noted that should the inquiry reveal instances of undue interference, appropriate actions as recommended by the Commission of Inquiry would need to be taken.