An investigation led by the Attorney General’s office has revealed that payment vouchers issued to the suspended director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Pryde, did not have the necessary approvals. During the tribunal’s proceedings, Principal Accounts Officer Paula Naitoka disclosed these findings on the final day of the hearings concerning allegations that Mr. Pryde received payments without proper authorization.
Mr. Naitoka noted that while the investigation had its limitations, particularly due to the restricted timeframe, two payment vouchers from January 2011 were uncovered. This was the same year Mr. Pryde was appointed as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). He could not confirm if there were sufficient records on Mr. Pryde’s payment history dating back to 2007 but emphasized that more records might have existed, indicating that not all documents were thoroughly reviewed.
According to Mr. Naitoka, there were shortcomings in the contract’s clauses governing the financial transactions, suggesting that the Judicial Service Commission should have conducted a more meticulous review of the conditions regarding approved amounts for Mr. Pryde.
Echoing these concerns, Auditor General Finau Nagera highlighted the need for further scrutiny regarding Mr. Pryde’s payroll specifics, including the rationale behind the calculated amounts. She noted that relevant discrepancies were only recognized once an investigation was initiated. Furthermore, she observed that similar practices were conducted by Mr. Pryde before his appointment as DPP, although these issues were not previously addressed in Parliament.
The tribunal concluded its hearings with five witnesses testifying, and the Fiji Law Society has been given until next Friday to submit their responses. The tribunal is expected to present its final report to President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu by December 23.
As the investigation continues, it is essential to highlight the commitment to transparency and accountability within the legal framework. The findings present an opportunity for the judicial system to strengthen its oversight mechanisms, ensuring that such discrepancies are addressed and prevented in the future. This proactive approach could enhance public trust in the legal system and ensure that governance remains robust and ethical.
In summary, the investigation into Christopher Pryde’s payment approvals has raised important questions about oversight within the judicial system, with key officials acknowledging the need for clearer guidelines and more thorough reviews of financial transactions.
Leave a comment