The Commission of Inquiry (COI) examining the appointment of Barbara Malimali as the Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) is seeking an extension of its hearings, now aiming to conclude by the end of February. This request arises due to the substantial amount of evidence still needing to be reviewed—only seven out of the 35 summoned witnesses have testified so far.

Justice David Ashton-Lewis, the lead judge on the commission, highlighted the significance of gathering detailed testimonies to ensure a thorough investigation. He noted the complexity of the case requires comprehensive questioning rather than simple answers. “We have gone through seven. We still have 28 to go,” he stated, emphasizing the need for a deep understanding of the testimony being provided.

The COI is tasked with assessing whether Malimali’s appointment last September adhered to legal standards and whether it was influenced by vested interests. This investigation not only targets individual conduct but also scrutinizes the integrity of institutions such as FICAC, the Judicial Services Commission (JSC), and the Constitutional Offices Commission (COC).

Counsel Assistant Janet Mason remarked that the inquiry’s emphasis on institutional integrity is crucial in upholding the credibility of the Fiji governance system. So far, witnesses have presented factual and unbiased accounts of their involvement without taking sides, ensuring professionalism in the examination process.

If granted, the extension of time sought by the COI could facilitate a more thorough exploration of the remaining testimonies and lead to a clearer picture of the allegations surrounding Malimali’s appointment. Such diligence reflects a broader commitment to enhancing transparency and accountability within Fiji’s public institutions, potentially paving the way for essential reforms and reinforcing public trust in governance.

In summary, while the inquiry faces challenges due to the complexity of the case, its focus on thorough examination is a significant step toward transparency and accountability in Fiji. The potential extension serves as a hopeful sign of a dedicated effort to uncover the truth and ensure integrity in public office, which can ultimately foster meaningful progress for governance in the nation.