The Commission of Inquiry (COI) examining the appointment of lawyer Barbara Malimali as the Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) is requesting an extension to its hearings until the end of February. This request comes as only seven out of the 35 summoned witnesses have provided testimony, underscoring the substantial amount of evidence that remains to be reviewed.
Justice David Ashton-Lewis, who is presiding over the inquiry, emphasized the need for thorough and detailed questioning, noting that simple affirmative answers are insufficient for a comprehensive understanding of Malimali’s appointment made last September. The COI was originally slated to submit its final report by January 31, but given the complexities involved, Ashton-Lewis expressed optimism that the President would grant an extension to allow all witnesses to share their accounts.
The inquiry, which aims to ensure that Malimali’s appointment followed legal protocols and was free from undue influence, is set to address potential interference from vested interests related to ongoing FICAC cases involving high-profile individuals, including politicians and senior officials. Counsel Assistant Janet Mason reiterated that the inquiry goes beyond individual accountability, focusing on the broader integrity of public institutions involved in the governance process.
The progress thus far has been slow due to the detailed nature of the testimonies, but witnesses have reportedly provided factual and unbiased accounts, contributing positively to the inquiry’s mission. As the commission seeks an extension, it signals a commitment to a thorough examination that could enhance public trust and inspire reform in Fiji’s governance framework.
This ongoing inquiry stands as a vital endeavor towards upholding integrity within Fiji’s political and judicial systems. An extended timeline for the hearings may allow the COI to delve deeper into the testimonies, potentially leading to significant reforms and reaffirming a culture of transparency and accountability in the nation’s public institutions.
Leave a comment