Supreme Court Justice and head of the Commission of Inquiry (COI) David Ashton-Lewis has underscored that it is too early to make any judgments regarding the appointment of Barbara Malimali as Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC). He stated that comprehensive evidence is necessary before any conclusions can be drawn about potential wrongdoing by the Judicial Services Commission or the Constitutional Offices Commission.

Justice Ashton-Lewis shared with FijiLive that both bodies function under the provisions of the 2013 Constitution, and noted, “What looks to be quite innocent in the beginning can change when you get all the evidence.” He explained that the balance of probability will guide his decision, suggesting an expansive scope for assessing the circumstances surrounding Malimali’s appointment.

Counsel Assistant Janet Mason echoed Ashton-Lewis’s sentiments, emphasizing the importance of refraining from premature conclusions, as doing so could be seen as biased. She noted that the inquiry aims to evaluate the integrity of state institutions, particularly amid ongoing concerns about political interference related to FICAC. Mason indicated that, while there are allegations pointing to political involvement, the inquiry focuses primarily on institutional integrity involving the Judicial Services Commission and the Constitutional Offices Commission.

The Commission of Inquiry is currently evaluating whether Malimali’s appointment, made in September 2024, adhered to proper legal procedures and whether it was subject to any unlawful influences, especially concerning ongoing cases involving notable political figures. Of the 35 witnesses scheduled to testify, seven have already taken their stands, and significant upcoming testimonies are expected from the Acting Director of Public Prosecutions and various former ministers.

This inquiry signifies a critical effort towards enhancing accountability and transparency in governance. As it continues to gather testimonies and evidence, there is a hopeful outlook that the proceedings will lead to necessary reforms, restoring public faith in governmental processes and ensuring that integrity is preserved in public service appointments in Fiji.

In summary, the ongoing investigation into the appointment of Barbara Malimali serves as an important moment for instilling transparency and ethical standards within Fiji’s governance framework, providing an opportunity for improved public trust in institutions.