The Commission of Inquiry (COI) presided over by Justice David Ashton Lewis has seen significant developments as it investigates the controversial appointment of Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) Commissioner Barbra Malimali. Recently, an investigator who collected evidence pertaining to the inquiry took the stand, marking a critical point in the proceedings that have now extended over two days beyond their initial two-hour plan.

Justice Lewis highlighted the complexity of the inquiry, necessitating prolonged questioning. He emphasized that the nature of a commission of inquiry is exploratory, requiring the examination of different leads, some of which may not yield fruitful information. “This is why the questioning for this particular witness is taking time,” he stated.

The COI differs from traditional trials as it is primarily focused on gathering facts rather than arguing legal points. The identity of the investigator is being kept confidential to protect ongoing criminal investigations related to the inquiry, as disclosing their identity could jeopardize those proceedings.

As the inquiry continues, the COI is expected to complete questioning its eighth witness by the end of today. Justice Lewis reaffirmed that the investigation aims to build a comprehensive report despite the extended timeline required for detailed examination, which reflects the commitment to transparency and accountability within Fiji’s governance.

Previously, it was reported that the COI might extend its hearings until late February as only a fraction of the planned witness testimony has been completed, which underscores the rigorous nature of the inquiry. The investigation has also seen prominent figures such as Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka and Supervisor of Elections Ana Mataiciwa provide testimony.

This inquiry signifies a proactive effort in promoting accountability within Fiji’s governmental institutions. Although the process is demanding, it highlights a hopeful direction towards fostering public trust and cultivating integrity in public office. Ensuring a thorough examination of the evidence may lead to meaningful reforms in governance, promoting a future characterized by improved standards of accountability and transparency.