High-Stakes Tribunal: Key Witnesses Weigh In on DPP Controversy

The investigation into suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Pryde, has drawn significant attention as prominent figures testify in a Tribunal. Key witnesses include Minister for Justice Siromi Turaga, Minister for Sugar Industry Charan Jeath Singh, Assistant Minister for Agriculture Tomasi Tunabuna, and the Permanent Secretary for Civil Service.

During the proceedings, Assistant Minister Tunabuna expressed concerns regarding Pryde and former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum being seen together in public, especially amid ongoing media reports of an active investigation involving Sayed-Khaiyum. Tunabuna described their interaction, which reportedly lasted over 30 minutes, as “unprofessional,” emphasizing that neither he nor others could overlook their presence during the discussion.

His apprehensions stemmed from knowledge of the investigation by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), which had not yet received approval from the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP). Tunabuna noted that a photo he captured was included as part of the evidence in the complaint by the Minister for Justice.

While Tunabuna could not hear the substance of their conversation, he articulated that their facial expressions indicated the seriousness of the matter. Roopesh Singh, representing the Fiji Law Society, pointed out that all witnesses shared observations based on perceptions rather than firsthand knowledge of the discussions taking place. He urged the Court to consider these aspects when making its judgment.

The Tribunal will reconvene tomorrow at 10 am to continue the proceedings.

The ongoing investigation reveals the complexities involved in the judicial process and underscores the need for transparency and professionalism among public officials. As the Tribunal examines the circumstances surrounding this case, it highlights the importance of maintaining public trust in legal institutions. The context of these testimonies signifies a crucial phase in addressing the allegations, ultimately striving for an outcome that upholds accountability and justice.