Fiji News From Around The World

Illustration of Pryde’s Superannuation Payments Branded ‘Theft’

High-Stakes Tribunal: Justice Calls DPP’s Payments ‘Theft’

Spread the love

The Acting Chief Justice and Chairperson of the Judicial Service Commission (JSC), Salesi Temo, has publicly labeled the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Pryde, as guilty of “theft” concerning his unauthorized monthly superannuation payment of US$1,000. Justice Temo’s comments came during the third day of a tribunal hearing at the Veiuto Court Complex.

The tribunal is addressing two main allegations against Pryde: the first involves a photograph of him with former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum taken at a diplomatic event on February 28, 2023; the second centers on the unauthorized superannuation payments that have reportedly amassed to over FJ$288,000 since 2012.

Justice Temo refuted media claims suggesting that the payments were merely over-compensation, categorically stating they are theft. He noted that investigations revealed a lack of records for these payments, which should have been authorized through consultations with the Attorney-General’s office and with approval from the President—none of which took place. The payments were halted in July 2023 when investigations began, and Temo emphasized that Pryde’s defense based on contractual reasons is insufficient to validate these transactions.

Additionally, regarding the widely circulated photograph with Sayed-Khaiyum, Justice Temo commented on the potential implications of such associations amid ongoing political controversies, asserting that public figures have a responsibility to maintain neutrality in both official and personal contexts.

When Pryde expressed concerns about financial pressures resulting from his suspension, Justice Temo dismissed the claims as unfounded, clarifying that the law allows for legal aid or self-representation in such circumstances.

The tribunal proceedings will resume today, indicating that the investigation into these serious allegations is ongoing.

This case illustrates the critical nature of ethical conduct within public office and the stringent oversight mechanisms in place to ensure accountability. Transparency and adherence to legal protocols are essential for maintaining public trust in the justice system.


Comments

Leave a comment

Latest News

Search the website