Former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum has clarified that his discussion with suspended Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Christopher Pryde was not related to the ongoing investigation by the Criminal Investigations Department (CID), as the tribunal hearing for Pryde began at the Court of Appeal in Suva. Sayed-Khaiyum stated that their conversation was centered on personal matters involving their children.
The dialogue took place at a diplomatic function on February 28, 2023, a time when the CID was investigating Sayed-Khaiyum, with the case file already submitted to the DPP’s Office. Pryde is currently suspended with pay following allegations of ‘misbehavior.’ He has refused to participate in the tribunal proceedings unless his salary is reinstated.
During his testimony, Sayed-Khaiyum also pointed out that other officials were present at the event, contradicting claims that he was only speaking to Pryde, and he mentioned his inability to recall the duration of their conversation. He denied discussing any of his legal matters during their exchange.
Regarding another allegation concerning the financial arrangements related to Pryde’s superannuation, Sayed-Khaiyum stated that these matters should be reviewed by the Judicial Services Commission (JSC). He emphasized that the JSC sets the remuneration for the DPP, based on consultations with the Attorney-General’s Office and approval from the President’s Office.
Minister for Justice Siromi Turaga, who is also a complainant in this case, testified that Sayed-Khaiyum and Pryde appeared isolated from the other guests during their long conversation, which he characterized as “unbecoming and unethical.” Turaga highlighted that given the ongoing investigation involving Sayed-Khaiyum, such a private discussion was inappropriate.
Pryde later acknowledged his error in judgment, expressing regret in an apology letter to Turaga. Following this, Turaga informed the Prime Minister and subsequently filed a formal complaint with the JSC.
The proceedings have been adjourned and are set to continue today.
This case highlights the complex relationship between legal and ethical obligations for public officials, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in governance. As these hearings unfold, they serve as a reminder of the public’s expectation for integrity in leadership.
In a hopeful light, regardless of the outcome, the investigations aim to uphold justice and ensure that all parties involved act in accordance with their responsibilities, reinforcing the rule of law in the country.
Leave a comment