The ongoing trial of Tevita Qaqa Kapawale at the Suva High Court continues to receive significant attention as the first state witness, Kaminieli Tucama, faced intense scrutiny during cross-examination by the defense team. Kapawale stands accused of five counts of murder, one count of attempted murder, and one count of criminal intimidation following a tragic incident aboard the fishing vessel FV Tiro II on May 18, 2021. The victims include both Fijian and Indonesian crew members, namely Benjamin Mattaputty, Eme Warma, Alfat Kodri, Samuela Sukera, and Qiritavabea Cagilabakomeli.

During today’s court session, Tucama was questioned regarding inconsistencies in his testimony compared to previous statements made to police. Defense attorney Tobia Ravuniwa suggested that tensions existed among crew members prior to the fishing trip, and evidence showed that Tucama and another witness, Mitieli Cama, are related. The alterations in the crew structure before departure also came under scrutiny, as Cama had not originally been slated to be the bosun but was appointed last minute.

Throughout the session, Tucama maintained that he did not participate in any plan to harm Kapawale or to hide the incident, despite the defense’s attempts to suggest collusion between him and Cama. He clarified that there was no fight at sea over the distribution of shark bycatch, a subject that had arisen during the questioning.

The trial highlights grave issues of safety and accountability in maritime environments, particularly emphasizing the necessity for strict adherence to guidelines and training in handling crew dynamics. As the proceedings advance, there is a collective hope for justice to be served not only for the families of the victims but also to strengthen the integrity of maritime operations.

The trial is likely to continue drawing public interest and scrutiny, offering vital insights into the challenges of ensuring safety and justice in maritime affairs. As the next witness, Mitieli Cama, is set to take the stand tomorrow, there is optimism that the judicial process will provide clarity and hopefully lead to a just outcome for all involved.