The Suva Magistrates Court is currently awaiting a motion from defense lawyer Davenesh Sharma in the case against former Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama and former Police Commissioner Sitiveni Qiliho. This motion is filed under Section 44(5) of Fiji’s Constitution, which addresses social justice and affirmative action, stipulating that special measures are not to be taken once substantial equality is achieved.
Bainimarama is charged with one count of making unwarranted demands as a public official, while Qiliho faces two counts of abuse of office. It is alleged that Bainimarama, while acting in his capacity as Prime Minister, pressured Rusiate Tudravu—the Acting Commissioner of Police—between May 21 and August 18, 2021, to terminate the employment of Sergeant Penieli Ratei and Police Constable Tomasi Naulu. If Tudravu failed to comply, Bainimarama allegedly threatened to resign.
Qiliho, on the other hand, is accused of overturning a disciplinary decision by Tudravu, where the original penalty for Ratei and Naulu was five equivalent paid working days. Instead, Qiliho allegedly terminated their employment entirely, an act seen as an abuse of his office.
The case is drawing significant public interest due to the high-profile nature of those involved, leading to heightened discussions around accountability and good governance in Fiji. The next court mention is set for April 11, which keeps the matter in the public eye as the pre-trial conference is also pending.
This situation is an important reminder of the need for accountability among public officials and the expectations of ethical governance in Fiji. The upcoming trial, scheduled from June 2 to July 11, 2025, with about 30 witnesses expected to testify, will be critical in reinforcing or challenging these principles, and many are hopeful that a transparent process will emerge from this legal challenge.
Leave a comment