The High Court is set to deliver a preliminary ruling on Monday concerning allegations directed at former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum and former Supervisor of Elections Mohammed Saneem. The core of the case involves claims of constitutional breaches tied to Saneem’s rights.
Both individuals appeared before Resident Magistrate Yogesh Prasad, where Sayed-Khaiyum faces charges of abuse of office, while Saneem is charged with illicitly receiving a corrupt benefit. These charges relate to actions purportedly taken between June 30 and July 12, 2022, during Sayed-Khaiyum’s time as acting Prime Minister. It is alleged that he signed a Deed of Variation and Addendum with Saneem without securing the necessary authorization from the Constitutional Offices Commission and the President.
In their defense, attorney Davanesh Sharma has raised pivotal questions regarding the eligibility of a Constitutional Office Holder to also fulfill roles within the Public Service. He has requested more time to review the recently consolidated charges that have been officially presented.
Further allegations suggest that Saneem unlawfully solicited and received over $50,000 in tax relief on his back pay from a senior government official between June 1 and July 31, 2022, indicating a lack of lawful authority or justification for his actions.
A trial date has tentatively been set for May 26 to May 30, with the next court session scheduled for April 15 to address plea submissions.
This case underscores significant legal challenges facing the government and brings to light the critical need for ethical conduct among public officials. As the legal proceedings unfold, there is optimism that a fair resolution will be reached, reinforcing the principles of justice and the integrity expected from those in public office.
Leave a comment